An in vitro, SEM and micro-CT comparison of dentinal tubule penetration and void formation by four bioceramic sealers in premolars

dc.contributor.advisorArnold, Samantha
dc.contributor.coadvisorBuchanan, Glynn Dale
dc.contributor.emaillotive.shabalala@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.contributor.postgraduateShabalala, Lotive
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-02T09:17:02Z
dc.date.available2024-02-02T09:17:02Z
dc.date.created2024-04
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionDissertation (MSc (Dentistry))--University of Pretoria, 2023.en_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Bioceramic sealers are receiving substantial attention because of their favourable physicobiological properties. Studies have shown that the use of materials containing calcium-silicates results in the formation of a crystalline structure similar to tooth and bone apatite, which is favourable in the healing of endodontic lesions. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the sealing ability of four bioceramic sealer materials, available commercially in South Africa, by measuring the formation of voids at three levels (coronal, middle and apical). Materials and Methods: In this study, four different bioceramic sealers (BioRoot RCS, CeraSeal, TotalFill, and AH Plus Bioceramic [BC]) were compared. Single rooted premolars were included. Coronectomies were performed on each tooth and the root canals were prepared using reciprocating instruments. The canal was then obturated using a single gutta-percha point and one of the four specified root canal sealers. The sealers were allowed to set, after which the obturations were analysed and compared using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) to evaluate void formation. Results: For the overall average of all three positions (coronal, middle, and apical), the mean surface area of voids of the four sealers did not differ significantly (p>0.05). The overall median surface area of voids for AH Plus BC and BioRoot differed significantly (p=0.049). Conclusion: None of the four tested bioceramic sealers demonstrated void-free fillings and voids were found in all samples to varying degrees.en_US
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden_US
dc.description.degreeMSc (Dentistry)en_US
dc.description.departmentOdontologyen_US
dc.description.facultyFaculty of Health Sciencesen_US
dc.description.sdgNoneen_US
dc.identifier.citation*en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.25403/UPresearchdata.25003031en_US
dc.identifier.otherA2024en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/94251
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoria
dc.rights© 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subjectUCTDen_US
dc.subjectBioceramicen_US
dc.subjectCalcium silicateen_US
dc.subjectDentin tubulesen_US
dc.subjectPenetrabilityen_US
dc.subjectVoid formationen_US
dc.titleAn in vitro, SEM and micro-CT comparison of dentinal tubule penetration and void formation by four bioceramic sealers in premolarsen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Shabala_Invitro_2023.pdf
Size:
2.89 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Main dissertation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: