Hospital and community isolates of uropathogens at a tertiary hospital in South Africa

Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Habte, T.M.
dc.contributor.author Dube, S.
dc.contributor.author Ismail, Nazir Ahmed
dc.contributor.author Hoosen, Anwar Ahmed
dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-23T09:58:48Z
dc.date.available 2009-09-23T09:58:48Z
dc.date.issued 2009-08
dc.description.abstract AIM: To investigate the profile of common uropathogens isolated from urine specimens submitted to the diagnostic microbiology laboratory at a tertiary teaching hospital and assess their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns to commonly used antimicrobial agents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of laboratory reports for all urine specimens submitted for investigations over a 1-year period. Isolates were tested by means of the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method for susceptibility to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, co-trimoxazole and nitrofurantoin, and for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production. RESULTS: Out of the total specimens (N =2 203) received over the 1-year study period, 51.1% (1 126) of the urine samples were culture-positive, the majority (65.4%) having come from females. The most common isolate was Escherichia coli (39.0%) followed by Klebsiella species (20.8%) and Enterococcus faecalis (8.2%). The Gram-negative isolates displayed a very high level of resistance to amoxicillin (range 43 - 100%) and co-trimoxazole (range 29 - 90%), whereas resistance to gentamicin (range 0 - 50%) and ciprofloxacin (range 0 - 33%) was lower. E. coli isolates were susceptible to nitrofurantoin (94%), and ESBL production was significantly higher (p=0.01) in the hospital isolates, compared with those from the community referral sites. CONCLUSIONS: The culture-positive rate for uropathogens was high, with a greater incidence among females. E. coli was the most common aetiological agent identified, and remained susceptible to nitrofurantoin. Resistance levels to amoxicillin and co-trimoxazole were very high for all Gram-negative isolates, and it is recommended that these antibiotics should not be used for the empiric treatment of urinary tract infections. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Habte, TM, Dube, S, Ismail, N & Hoosen, AA 2009, 'Hospital and community isolates of uropathogens at a tertiary hospital in South Africa', South African Medical Journal, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 584-587. [www.samj.org.za] en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0038-3469
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/11360
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Health and Medical Publishing Group en_US
dc.rights Health and Medical Publishing Group en_US
dc.subject Uropathogens en
dc.subject.lcsh Urine -- Analysis en
dc.subject.lcsh Pathogenic microorganisms -- Identification en
dc.subject.lcsh Anti-infective agents -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Hospitals -- South Africa en
dc.subject.lcsh Diagnostic microbiology -- South Africa en
dc.title Hospital and community isolates of uropathogens at a tertiary hospital in South Africa en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record