The potential delictual liability of non-vaccinating parents in South Africa

dc.contributor.advisorSchoeman, Elsabe
dc.contributor.coadvisorZitzke, Emile
dc.contributor.emailliesl.hager@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.contributor.postgraduateHager, Liesl
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-27T10:05:16Z
dc.date.available2023-07-27T10:05:16Z
dc.date.created2023
dc.date.issued2023
dc.descriptionThesis (LLD)--University of Pretoria, 2023.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores the potential delictual liability of non-vaccinating parents in South Africa for the harm caused to another by failing to have their child vaccinated. The South African common-law delict is explored with specific reference to the five common-law delictual elements, as well as the three historic actions: the actio iniuriarum; the Germanic action for pain and suffering; and the actio legis Aquiliae. In Chapter 1, the reader is introduced to the research topic, and specifically the issue of non-vaccination, what it entails for purposes of this thesis, and why the non-vaccination of a child may potentially attract delictual liability. Chapter 2 explores non-vaccination in greater detail, including the importance of vaccination, a short overview of the history of non-vaccination, and why non-vaccination is still regarded as a global health threat. Non-vaccination is considered against a constitutional backdrop in Chapter 3 to establish whether children have an express or implied constitutional right to vaccination and whether or not parents have a corresponding duty to vaccinate their children. Chapter 3 also considers the common-law rights of parents as well as the role of the Children’s Act in the constitutional conundrum. Foreign-law considerations regarding the potential civil liability of non-vaccinating parents are considered in Chapter 4 with reference to foreign case law and legislation. The South African common-law delict is explored in Chapter 5 and each delictual element is considered in detail to establish whether non-vaccinating parents could possibly face delictual liability for the harm caused to others by their failure to have their child vaccinated. In Chapter 6 recommendations for statutory reform are made with reference to the consequences of imposing delictual liability and to assist litigants in a delictual suit. Chapter 7 concludes the thesis with a short summary of the chapters and concluding remarks. Keywords: non-vaccination; anti-vax; delictual liability; children’s rights; negligence; torts; duties; breach; best interests; common-law delict; wrongfulness; harm; conduct; causation; fault.en_US
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden_US
dc.description.degreeLLDen_US
dc.description.departmentPrivate Lawen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSkye Foundationen_US
dc.identifier.citation*en_US
dc.identifier.otherS2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/91651
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoria
dc.rights© 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subjectnon-vaccinationen_US
dc.subjectdelictual liabilityen_US
dc.subjectchildren’s rightsen_US
dc.subjectnegligenceen_US
dc.subjecttortsen_US
dc.subjectbest interestsen_US
dc.subjectcommon-law delicten_US
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.titleThe potential delictual liability of non-vaccinating parents in South Africaen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hager_Potential_2023.pdf
Size:
17.93 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: