Comparative analysis of the subsidence of solid polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and 3D printed lattice titanium interbody fusion cages

dc.contributor.authorMoolman, Frans J.
dc.contributor.authorKat, Cor-Jacques
dc.contributor.authorDu Plessis, Anton
dc.contributor.authorKhodja, Malika
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-26T07:17:16Z
dc.date.available2025-09-26T07:17:16Z
dc.date.issued2023-12
dc.descriptionPaper presented at the 2023 RAPDASA-RobMech-PRASA-AMI Conference Advanced Manufacturing Beyond Borders - The 24th Annual International RAPDASA Conference joined by RobMech, PRASA and AMI, hosted by CSIR and CUT.
dc.description.abstractSpinal interbody fusion cages are commonly used to treat various spinal conditions, but their traditional manufacturing methods have limitations in customization and fitting. With the advancement of 3D printing, it is now possible to design and manufacture interbody fusion cages with previously unachievable features and structures. Southern Medical™ is investigating the technical feasibility of 3D-printed cages based on their existing designs and exploring the new features and capabilities enabled by additive manufacturing (AM). The mechanical performance in the subsidence of the 3D-printed devices will be compared to their existing devices as one of the feasibility points for the additively manufactured implants. A gyroid structure is used as the inner lattice of the structures. To investigate the performance of the cages with the new gyroid lattices, subsidence testing according to the ASTM F2267 methods was conducted to compare existing cages to the 3D-printed cages. The 3D printed devices outperformed the PEEK counterparts with a higher test block stiffness of 0.81 kN/mm compared to 0.55 kN/mm.
dc.description.departmentMaterials Science and Metallurgical Engineering
dc.description.departmentMechanical and Aeronautical Engineering
dc.description.librarianhj2025
dc.description.sdgSDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
dc.description.urihttps://www.matec-conferences.org/
dc.identifier.citationMoolman, F., Kat, C.-J., Du Plessis, A. & Khodja, M. 2023, 'Comparative analysis of the subsidence of solid polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and 3D printed lattice titanium interbody fusion cages', MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 388, art. 01001, pp. 1-11, https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202338801001.
dc.identifier.issn2261-236X (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1051/matecconf/202338801001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/104500
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEDP Sciences
dc.rights© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences, 2023. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0.
dc.subjectSpinal interbody fusion cages
dc.subjectManufacturing
dc.subject3D printing
dc.subject3D-printed cages
dc.subjectAdditive manufacturing
dc.subjectMechanical performance
dc.titleComparative analysis of the subsidence of solid polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and 3D printed lattice titanium interbody fusion cages
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Moolman_Comparative_2023.pdf
Size:
568.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: