Analysing organisational robustness in the application of project portfolio management

dc.contributor.authorBekker, Michiel Christiaan
dc.contributor.authorSteenkamp, D.
dc.contributor.emailgiel.bekker@up.ac.za
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-08T12:15:01Z
dc.date.available2025-08-08T12:15:01Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-13
dc.description.abstractENGLISH : Project portfolio management (PPM) has become a popular practice among organisations in effectively driving a collection of projects and/or programmes to align with and meet their strategic objectives. PPM is still considered a new concept, and is in the early days of its implementation. Even the best-performing organisations are still not excelling in executing best practices in PPM. This research reviews the literature on the robustness of portfolio governance controls. A semi-structured technique entailing a questionnaire and qualitative interviews to access best practices was used with a population of PPM professionals from various industries. The paper reviews the impact of higher levels of compliance on a model and/or framework in more mature environments in order to prevent or minimise the influence of external elements such as executive veto on PPM practices.
dc.description.abstractARTIKAANS : Projekportefeuljebestuur (PPM) het ’n gewilde praktyk onder organisasies geword om effektief ’n versameling projekte en/of programme te inisieer ten einde hul strategiese doelstellings te belyn en te bereik. PPM word steeds as ’n nuwe konsep beskou en is in die vroeë stadium van implementering. Selfs die organisasies wat die beste presteer, beoefen steeds nie die beste praktyke in PPM nie. Hierdie navorsing ondersoek die literatuur rakende die robuustheid van portefeuljebestuurskontroles. ’n Semi-gestruktureerde vraelys en onderhoud tegniek was gebruik om insae te kry tot die beste praktyje in die industrie. Die navorsingsbevolking het bestaan uit PPM-professionele persone in verskillende industrieë. Die navorsing beoordeel die impak van hoër vlakke van voldoening aan 'n model en/of raamwerk in meer volwasse omgewings en om die invloed van eksterne elemente soos uitvoerende veto op PPM-praktyke te voorkom of te verminder.
dc.description.departmentGraduate School of Technology Management (GSTM)
dc.description.librarianam2025
dc.description.sdgSDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
dc.description.urihttps://journals.co.za/journal/indeng
dc.identifier.citationBekker, M.C. & Steenkamp, D. 2024, 'Analysing organisational robustness in the application of project portfolio management', South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 13-26. http://dx.doi.org//10.7166/35-4-2563.
dc.identifier.issn1012-277X (print)
dc.identifier.issn2224-7890 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.7166/35-4-2563
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/103855
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSouth African Institute of Industrial Engineers
dc.rights© South African Institute of Industrial Engineers.
dc.subjectProject portfolio management (PPM)
dc.subjectOrganisations
dc.subjectProjects
dc.subjectProjekportefeuljebestuur
dc.subjectOrganisasies
dc.subjectProjekte
dc.titleAnalysing organisational robustness in the application of project portfolio management
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Bekker_Analysing_2024.pdf
Size:
417.43 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: