Reply to Datta, “Is static or cidal antibiotic falsifiable?”
| dc.contributor.author | Spellberg, Brad | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wald-Dickler, Noah | |
| dc.contributor.author | Holtom, Paul | |
| dc.contributor.author | Meyer-Sautter, Pascal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Camp, Austin | |
| dc.contributor.author | Diaz Diaz, Alejandro | |
| dc.contributor.author | Buhamad, Ranya | |
| dc.contributor.author | Meza Vazquez, Ali Sebastian | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aguirre-Garcia, Gloria Mayela | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stanton, Matthew | |
| dc.contributor.author | Butler-Wu, Susan M. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Chiu, Isabelle | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ergenc, Zeynep | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bhoojhawon, Guru | |
| dc.contributor.author | Murri, Rita | |
| dc.contributor.author | Maraolo, Alberto Enrico | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cabanilla, Gabriela | |
| dc.contributor.author | Riccardi, Niccolò | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tshisevhe, Vhudzani | |
| dc.contributor.author | Behenna, Curtis | |
| dc.contributor.author | Williams, Karen S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kufel, Wesley D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Wojciaczyk, Natalia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Pimentel, Bernardo Vidal | |
| dc.contributor.author | Muyidi,, Ahmed | |
| dc.contributor.author | Costa, Rodrigo P.L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Motta, Fabrizio | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bortolussi-Courval, Émilie | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Todd C. | |
| dc.contributor.author | McDonald, Emily G. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ghanem, Bassam | |
| dc.contributor.author | Nelson, Zachary | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-30T06:23:11Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-30T06:23:11Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-11 | |
| dc.description.abstract | We would like to thank Dr. Datta for his interest in our article. Dr. Datta wishes to defend the static vs. cidal antibiotic model against “absolutist framing.” He invokes “mono-parametric” assays like “MBC/MIC ratios or…reactive oxygen species generation” to suggest that in vitro static vs. cidal phenomenology may be phenotypically real. | |
| dc.description.department | Medical Microbiology | |
| dc.description.librarian | am2026 | |
| dc.description.sdg | SDG-03: Good health and well-being | |
| dc.description.uri | https://journals.asm.org/journal/aac | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Spellberg, B., Wald-Dickler, N., Holtom, P. et al. 2025, 'Reply to Datta, “Is static or cidal antibiotic falsifiable?”', Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1128/aac.01361-25. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0066-4804 (print) | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1098-6596 (online) | |
| dc.identifier.other | 10.1128/aac.01361-25 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/107716 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | American Society for Microbiology | |
| dc.rights | © 2025 Spellberg et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. | |
| dc.subject | Static vs. cidal antibiotic model | |
| dc.subject | Absolutist framing | |
| dc.subject | Mono-parametric | |
| dc.subject | In vitro | |
| dc.subject | Reply | |
| dc.title | Reply to Datta, “Is static or cidal antibiotic falsifiable?” | |
| dc.type | Article |
