Brucellosis seropositivity using three serological tests and associated risk factors in abattoir workers in Gauteng province, South Africa

dc.contributor.authorKolo, Francis Babaman
dc.contributor.authorAdesiyun, Abiodun Adewale
dc.contributor.authorFasina, Folorunso Oludayo
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Bernice Nerine
dc.contributor.authorRossouw, Jennifer
dc.contributor.authorByaruhanga, Charles
dc.contributor.authorDe Wet Geyer, Hermanus
dc.contributor.authorBlumberg, Lucille
dc.contributor.authorFrean, John
dc.contributor.authorVan Heerden, Henriette
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-09T04:28:18Z
dc.date.available2025-04-09T04:28:18Z
dc.date.issued2024-01
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.en_US
dc.descriptionThis article belongs to the special issue titled 'Bacterial Infections: Surveillance, Prevention and Control'.en_US
dc.description.abstractAbattoir workers are liable to zoonotic infections from animals and animal products, primarily to diseases with asymptomatic and chronic clinical manifestations in animals, such as brucellosis. No published reports exist on the seroprevalence of brucellosis in abattoir workers in South Africa. Therefore, this cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate the occurrence and risk factors for Brucella exposure in abattoir workers in Gauteng Province. A total of 103 abattoir workers and managers from 6 abattoirs, where brucellosis-positive slaughtered cattle and sheep were previously detected, were interviewed and tested with serological assays using the Rose Bengal test (RBT), BrucellaCapt, and IgG-ELISA. A pre-tested questionnaire was administered to consenting respondents to obtain information on risk factors for brucellosis. Of the 103 respondents tested, the distribution of female and male workers was 16 (15.5%) and 87 (84.5%), respectively. The seroprevalence for exposure to brucellosis was 21/103 (20.4%, 95%CI: 13.1–29.5) using a combination of RBT, BrucellaCapt, or IgG-ELISA. For test-specific results, seroprevalences by RBT, BrucellaCapt, and IgG-ELISA were 13/103 (12.6%, 95%CI: 6.9–20.6), 9/103 (8.74%, 95%CI: 4.1–15.9), and 18/103 (17.5%, 95%CI: 10.7–26.2), respectively. Low-throughput abattoirs were identified as associated risks, as 29.3% of workers were seropositive compared with 12.7% of workers in high-throughput abattoirs, which highlights that direct contact at abattoirs poses higher risk to workers than indirect and direct contact outside abattoirs. This study confirms the occurrence of Brucella spp. antibodies among abattoir workers in South Africa, possibly due to occupational exposure to Brucella spp., and highlights the occupational hazard to workers. Furthermore, findings underscore that abattoir facilities can serve as points for active and passive surveillance for indicators of diseases of public health importance. We recommend periodic implementation of brucellosis testing of abattoir workers country-wide to establish baseline data for informing appropriate preventive practices and reducing the potential burden of infection rates among these high-risk workers.en_US
dc.description.departmentProduction Animal Studiesen_US
dc.description.departmentSchool of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH)en_US
dc.description.departmentVeterinary Tropical Diseasesen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-08:Decent work and economic growthen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/pathogensen_US
dc.identifier.citationKolo, F.B.; Adesiyun, A.A.; Fasina, F.O.; Harris, B.N.; Rossouw, J.; Byaruhanga, C.; Geyer, H.D.W.; Blumberg, L.; Frean, J.; van Heerden, H. Brucellosis Seropositivity Using Three Serological Tests and Associated Risk Factors in Abattoir Workers in Gauteng Province, South Africa. Pathogens 2024, 13, 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13010064.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2076-0817 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.3390/pathogens13010064
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/101929
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rights© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an Open Access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectBrucellosisen_US
dc.subjectHumanen_US
dc.subjectSerologyen_US
dc.subjectAbattoiren_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.subjectSDG-08: Decent work and economic growthen_US
dc.subjectGauteng Province, South Africaen_US
dc.titleBrucellosis seropositivity using three serological tests and associated risk factors in abattoir workers in Gauteng province, South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kolo_Brucellosis_2024.pdf
Size:
269.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: