Brucellosis seropositivity using three serological tests and associated risk factors in abattoir workers in Gauteng province, South Africa
Loading...
Date
Authors
Kolo, Francis Babaman
Adesiyun, Abiodun Adewale
Fasina, Folorunso Oludayo
Harris, Bernice Nerine
Rossouw, Jennifer
Byaruhanga, Charles
De Wet Geyer, Hermanus
Blumberg, Lucille
Frean, John
Van Heerden, Henriette
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
MDPI
Abstract
Abattoir workers are liable to zoonotic infections from animals and animal products,
primarily to diseases with asymptomatic and chronic clinical manifestations in animals, such as
brucellosis. No published reports exist on the seroprevalence of brucellosis in abattoir workers in
South Africa. Therefore, this cross-sectional study was conducted to estimate the occurrence and
risk factors for Brucella exposure in abattoir workers in Gauteng Province. A total of 103 abattoir
workers and managers from 6 abattoirs, where brucellosis-positive slaughtered cattle and sheep were
previously detected, were interviewed and tested with serological assays using the Rose Bengal test
(RBT), BrucellaCapt, and IgG-ELISA. A pre-tested questionnaire was administered to consenting
respondents to obtain information on risk factors for brucellosis. Of the 103 respondents tested,
the distribution of female and male workers was 16 (15.5%) and 87 (84.5%), respectively. The
seroprevalence for exposure to brucellosis was 21/103 (20.4%, 95%CI: 13.1–29.5) using a combination
of RBT, BrucellaCapt, or IgG-ELISA. For test-specific results, seroprevalences by RBT, BrucellaCapt,
and IgG-ELISA were 13/103 (12.6%, 95%CI: 6.9–20.6), 9/103 (8.74%, 95%CI: 4.1–15.9), and 18/103
(17.5%, 95%CI: 10.7–26.2), respectively. Low-throughput abattoirs were identified as associated
risks, as 29.3% of workers were seropositive compared with 12.7% of workers in high-throughput
abattoirs, which highlights that direct contact at abattoirs poses higher risk to workers than indirect
and direct contact outside abattoirs. This study confirms the occurrence of Brucella spp. antibodies
among abattoir workers in South Africa, possibly due to occupational exposure to Brucella spp.,
and highlights the occupational hazard to workers. Furthermore, findings underscore that abattoir
facilities can serve as points for active and passive surveillance for indicators of diseases of public
health importance. We recommend periodic implementation of brucellosis testing of abattoir workers
country-wide to establish baseline data for informing appropriate preventive practices and reducing
the potential burden of infection rates among these high-risk workers.
Description
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: The data presented in this study are available on request from the
corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.
This article belongs to the special issue titled 'Bacterial Infections: Surveillance, Prevention and Control'.
This article belongs to the special issue titled 'Bacterial Infections: Surveillance, Prevention and Control'.
Keywords
Brucellosis, Human, Serology, Abattoir, SDG-03: Good health and well-being, SDG-08: Decent work and economic growth, Gauteng Province, South Africa
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG-03:Good heatlh and well-being
SDG-08:Decent work and economic growth
SDG-08:Decent work and economic growth
Citation
Kolo, F.B.; Adesiyun, A.A.;
Fasina, F.O.; Harris, B.N.; Rossouw, J.;
Byaruhanga, C.; Geyer, H.D.W.;
Blumberg, L.; Frean, J.; van Heerden,
H. Brucellosis Seropositivity Using
Three Serological Tests and
Associated Risk Factors in Abattoir
Workers in Gauteng Province, South
Africa. Pathogens 2024, 13, 64.
https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13010064.