JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.
The effects of outdated data and outliers on Kenya’s 2019 Global Food Security Index score and rank
The heterogeneity of food security indicators and the lack of consensus on comparing and ranking countries have driven international organisations to build composite indicators (Santeramo 2015). Composite indicators are aggregated indexes comprising individual indicators and weights, each representing an indicator’s relative importance based on a given underlying model (Nardo et al. 2005). Policymakers often rely on composite indicators as useful diagnostic tools for prioritising policies (Turan et al. 2018), while in benchmarking exercises, poor-performing countries also learn from better-performing countries. Moreover, composite indicators are essential for public communication due to ease of interpretation (Santeramo 2017).
Description:
AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL : The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available in the Global Food Security Index repository at https://foodsecurityindex.eiu.com/.
ADDITIONAL FILE 1: TABLE S1. GFSI dimensions, indicators and sub indicators. TABLE S2. Changes in scores for the 113 countries after winsorisation of the outlier data points. TABLE S3. Shifts in ranks for the 113 countries after the winsorisation of the outlier data points in the 2019 GFSI database.