JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.
How to make sense of the civil prohibition of hate speech in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000
In this article the authors offer a workable interpretation of section 10 of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000. Many constitutional law and freedom of expression scholars have argued that section 10 is at least in part unconstitutional. The authors of this article analyse these scholars’ views and chart a path towards saving section 10 from unconstitutionality. Section 10 is analysed by interrogating each of the requirements for hate speech as set out in the section: ‘no person’; ‘publish, propagate, advocate or communicate words’; ‘based on one or more of the prohibited grounds’; ‘that could reasonably be construed to demonstrate a clear intention’; ‘to be hurtful; be harmful or to incite harm; promote or propagate hatred’ and the defences listed in section 12. The article concludes with a proposal for legislative amendments to section 10 to remove any doubt about its constitutionality.