Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.
dc.contributor.author | Cromhout, Markus![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-06-12T12:01:52Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-06-12T12:01:52Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article is focussed on Q's treatment of the Law and what it can tell us about the Q community's Judean ethnic identity. It is argued that part of the reason for the incorporation of the main redaction in Q (here Kloppenborg's Q2 + Q3) was to defend the Judean ethnic identity of the Q people. This becomes evident in its conservative approach to the Law as opposed to that of the formative stratum where the Law was freely reconstructed. Q's approach to the Law is also informed by its Moses / New Exodus typology encountered in the various strata. | en |
dc.format.extent | 148980 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.identifier.citation | Cromhout, M 2006, '"We are Judean"! The Sayings Gospel Q's redactional approach to the Law', Verbum et Ecclesia, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 794-820. [http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_verbum.html] | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1609-9982 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/2711 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria | en |
dc.rights | Faculty of Theology, University of Pretoria | en |
dc.subject | Q people | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Jewish law | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Q hypothesis (Synoptics criticism) | |
dc.subject.lcsh | Judaism -- History -- Post-exilic period, 586 B.C.-210 A.D. | |
dc.title | "We are Judean"! The Sayings Gospel Q's redactional approach to the Law | en |
dc.type | Article | en |