Product liability in an age of development risks : should South Africa reconsider adopting a development risk defence?

Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tennant, Sarah-lynn
dc.contributor.author Van Heerden, C.M. (Corlia)
dc.date.accessioned 2025-04-16T05:57:00Z
dc.date.available 2025-04-16T05:57:00Z
dc.date.issued 2024-10
dc.description.abstract To provide protection against harm caused by defective, unsafe products and to promote product safety, the law of product liability has developed as a specialized area of the law of delict (tort). The vexing question is, who should bear such liability? This contribution interrogates the notorious EU development risk defence, which exonerates manufacturers that meet certain stringent requirements for undiscoverable development risks in products that consequently inflict harm on consumers. In particular, it considers the election by South Africa, which recently adopted a “strict” product liability regime with the introduction of the Consumer Protection Act 2008, not to adopt such a defence. The purpose of this contribution is to consider the nature and scope of the development risk defence as contained in article 7(e) of the European Union (EU) Product Liability Directive and to determine whether it was prudent for South Africa to steer clear of incorporating a similar defence in its new statutory product liability regime. en_US
dc.description.department Mercantile Law en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-12:Responsible consumption and production en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-16:Peace,justice and strong institutions en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-african-law en_US
dc.identifier.citation Tennant, S.-L. & Van Heerden, C. Product Liability in an Age of Development Risks: Should South Africa Reconsider Adopting a Development Risk Defence? Journal of African Law. 2024; 68(3): 359-377. doi:10.1017/S0021855323000360. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0021-8553 (print)
dc.identifier.issn 1464-3731 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.1017/S0021855323000360
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/102120
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Cambridge University Press en_US
dc.rights © University of Pretoria, 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of SOAS, University of London. en_US
dc.subject Defective products en_US
dc.subject Developmental risk en_US
dc.subject Developmental risk defence en_US
dc.subject Hybrid regime en_US
dc.subject Product liability en_US
dc.subject Strict liability en_US
dc.subject SDG-12: Responsible consumption and production en_US
dc.subject SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions en_US
dc.title Product liability in an age of development risks : should South Africa reconsider adopting a development risk defence? en_US
dc.type Postprint Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record