Evaluation of micrometeorological models for estimating crop evapotranspiration using a smart field weighing lysimeter

Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ratshiedana, Phathutshedzo Eugene
dc.contributor.author Abd Elbasit, Mohamed A.M.
dc.contributor.author Adam, Elhadi
dc.contributor.author Chirima, Johannes George
dc.date.accessioned 2025-02-06T12:55:55Z
dc.date.available 2025-02-06T12:55:55Z
dc.date.issued 2025-01
dc.description DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. This is in accordance with the organization’s intellectual property policy. en_US
dc.description.abstract Accurate estimation of crop water use, which is expressed as evapotranspiration (ET) is an important task for effective irrigation and agricultural water management. Although direct field measurement of actual evapotranspiration (ETa) is the most reliable method, practical and economic limitations often make it difficult to acquire, especially in developing countries. Consequently, crop evapotranspiration (ETc) is calculated using reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and crop-specific coefficients (Kc) to support irrigation water management practices. Several ETo models have been developed to address varying environmental conditions; however, their transferability to new environments often leads to under or over estimation of ETo, which has an impact on ETc estimation. This study evaluated the accuracy of 30 ETo micrometeorological models to estimate ETc under different seasonal and micro-climatic conditions using ETa data directly measured using a smart field weighing lysimeter as a benchmark. Local Kc values were derived from field-based measurements, while statistical metrics were applied for the evaluation process. A cumulative ranking approach was used to assess the accuracy and consistency of the models across four cropping seasons. Results demonstrated the Penman–Monteith model to be the most consistent model in estimating ETc, which outperformed other models across all cropping seasons. The performance of alternative models differed significantly with seasonal conditions, indicating their susceptibility to seasonality. The findings demonstrated the Penman–Monteith model as the most reliable approach for estimating ETc, which justifies its application role as a benchmark for validating other ETo models in data-limited areas. The study emphasizes the importance of site-specific validation and calibration of ETo models to improve their accuracy, applicability, and reliability in diverse environmental conditions. en_US
dc.description.department Geography, Geoinformatics and Meteorology en_US
dc.description.librarian hj2024 en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-02:Zero Hunger en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-13:Climate action en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-15:Life on land en_US
dc.description.sponsorship The Water Research Commission (WRC) of South Africa, the National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa and the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) of South Africa. en_US
dc.description.uri https://www.mdpi.com/journal/water en_US
dc.identifier.citation Ratshiedana, P.E.; Abd Elbasit, M.A.M.; Adam, E.; Chirima, J.G. Evaluation of Micrometeorological Models for Estimating Crop Evapotranspiration Using a Smart Field Weighing Lysimeter. Water 2025, 17, 187. https://doi.org/10.3390/w17020187. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2073-4441 (online)
dc.identifier.other 10.3390/w17020187
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/100588
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher MDPI en_US
dc.rights © 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). en_US
dc.subject Reference evapotranspiration en_US
dc.subject Water scarcity en_US
dc.subject Crop coefficient en_US
dc.subject Arid regions en_US
dc.subject Crop water use en_US
dc.subject SDG-02: Zero hunger en_US
dc.subject SDG-13: Climate action en_US
dc.subject SDG-15: Life on land en_US
dc.subject Evapotranspiration (ETo) en_US
dc.subject Crop evapotranspiration (ETc) en_US
dc.subject Actual evapotranspiration (ETa) en_US
dc.title Evaluation of micrometeorological models for estimating crop evapotranspiration using a smart field weighing lysimeter en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record