Please note that UPSpace will be unavailable from Friday, 2 May at 18:00 (South African Time) until Sunday, 4 May at 20:00 due to scheduled system upgrades. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding.
dc.contributor.author | Jensen, Frank![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark![]() |
|
dc.contributor.author | Sunde, Peter![]() |
|
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-17T04:45:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-01-17T04:45:27Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-10 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we conduct a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of five alternative management strategies for red deer in Denmark: free harvest, trophy hunting, maximum harvest and two cases for natural demographic population compositions. To capture the outcome under each strategy we use a biological sex- and age-structured population model. The net benefit function includes meat values, recreational values, browsing damage costs and traffic damage costs and these values and costs are assumed to differ for the various sex and age classes of red deer. We show that the maximum harvest strategy leads to a reasonably high positive total net benefit, while the free harvest strategy yields a small positive net benefit. On the other hand, the trophy hunting strategy generates a high negative net benefit, while small negative net benefits are obtained under the two strategies for natural demographic population compositions. | en_US |
dc.description.department | Agricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Development | en_US |
dc.description.sdg | SDG-12:Responsible consumption and production | en_US |
dc.description.sdg | SDG-15:Life on land | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | The Danish Environmental Protection Agency and Copenhagen University. | en_US |
dc.description.uri | http://link.springer.com/journal/267 | en_US |
dc.description.uri | Denmark | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Jensen, F., Lundhede, T. & Sunde, P. A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Alternative Management Strategies for Red Deer in Denmark. Environmental Management 74, 648–663 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-024-02023-y. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0364-152X (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1432-1009 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1007/s00267-024-02023-y | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/100114 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_US |
dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2024. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. | en_US |
dc.subject | Sex and age-structured population model | en_US |
dc.subject | SDG-12: Responsible consumption and production | en_US |
dc.subject | SDG-15: Life on land | en_US |
dc.subject | Management strategies | en_US |
dc.subject | Cost-benefit analysis (CBA) | en_US |
dc.subject | Red deer | en_US |
dc.title | A cost-benefit analysis of alternative management strategies for red deer in Denmark | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |