Capacity-based feasibility boundaries for shared priority infrastructure for minibus taxis at signalised intersections
| dc.contributor.author | Mwenda, John Paul | |
| dc.contributor.author | Venter, Christoffel Jacobus | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-14T04:28:06Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-04-14T04:28:06Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-12 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The minibus taxi (MBT) is the most widely used mode of public transport in South Africa, accounting for over 66% of peak hour public transport trips. Unlike buses, which benefit from dedicated infrastructure such as bus rapid transit (BRT) lanes with priority transit signals at intersections, MBTs currently lack such priority infrastructure to enhance their efficiency. Efforts by South African road authorities to provide priority infrastructure for MBTs are hindered by the absence of technical guidance on planning, design, and feasibility. This study addresses this gap by developing an analytical method to determine feasible traffic volumes for shared queue bypass priority lanes at pre-timed signalised intersections. The basic problem is that any priority given to MBT vehicles likely reduces the capacity available to other vehicles, which could lead to performance losses. Taking account of this interaction between MBT and general traffic volumes and the reallocation of vehicles to different lanes, we define feasibility as the combination of volumes where capacity is not exceeded for either vehicle type while still offering potential delay savings for MBTs. We produce a set of graphs that can serve as an initial assessment of whether intersections with medium to high MBT volumes may qualify for priority treatment, considering only existing geometric and traffic characteristics. Additionally, the study provides guidance on expected storage lengths for these priority lanes. Overall, the findings indicate that shared queue bypass lanes are effective when medium taxi volumes (approximately 20 PCU/hr to 85 PCU/hr) are present, provided that turning traffic in the shared left-turn lane is not excessively high (between 50 PCU/hr and 640 PCU/hr, depending on green time). Noting that drivers may adapt to priority intersections in unknown ways, we recommend further studies on the traffic safety implications of priority treatments under real operating conditions. | |
| dc.description.department | Civil Engineering | |
| dc.description.librarian | am2026 | |
| dc.description.sdg | SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure | |
| dc.description.sdg | SDG-11: Sustainable cities and communities | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The Centre for Transport Development at the University of Pretoria for financial support. | |
| dc.description.uri | https://saice.org.za/journal/ | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Mwenda, J.P. & Venter, C.J. Capacity-based feasibility boundaries for shared priority infrastructure for minibus taxis at signalised intersections. Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering 2025: 67(3), Art. #1748, 12 pages. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2309-8775/2025/v67n3a2. | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1021-2019 (print) | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2309-8775 (online) | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 10.17159/2309-8775/2025/v67n3a2 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/109543 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | South African Institute of Civil Engineers | |
| dc.rights | © The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. | |
| dc.subject | Minibus taxi (MBT) | |
| dc.subject | Shared queue bypass lane | |
| dc.subject | Intersection | |
| dc.subject | Highway capacity manual | |
| dc.subject | Paratransit | |
| dc.subject | Transit priority | |
| dc.subject | Bus rapid transit (BRT) | |
| dc.title | Capacity-based feasibility boundaries for shared priority infrastructure for minibus taxis at signalised intersections | |
| dc.type | Article |
