Verhouding tussen Kolossense en Efesiërs as ’n sinoptiese probleem

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Van Wyk, B.J. (Barend Jacobus), 1946-

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

OpenJournals Publishing

Abstract

Research by different scholars concluded that some letters traditionally ascribed to Paul were probably not written by him and drew a distinction between Pauline and Deutero-Pauline letters. The majority of scholars nowadays are of the opinion that the letters to the Colossians and the Ephesians are Deutero-Pauline and that Ephesians, at least, was surely not written by Paul. The results of research on the synoptic problem can be used and applied to the two letters under discussion because a comparison shows that there are striking similarities between the two. The most recent research shows that Ephesians made use of the letter to the Colossians but not without redactional changes to suit the author’s literary purpose. This method is exegetically known as redaction-criticism, linked to the social-science viewpoint that the author of the letter to the Ephesians acted as a change agent on behalf of a change agency.

Description

Keywords

Kolossense, Sinoptiese probleem, Colossians, Ephesians, Synoptic problem, Efesiërs

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Van Wyk, B., 2015, 'Die verhouding tussen Kolossense en Efesiërs as ’n sinoptiese probleem', HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 71(3), Art. #3067, 7 pages. http://dx.DOI.org/ 10.4102/hts.v71i3.3067.