Evaluation of the medically necessary, time sensitive triage score during and beyond the local COVID-19 pandemic in the gynaecologic oncology unit of a tertiary hospital in South Africa

dc.contributor.authorSajo, Adekunle Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorMouton, Arrie
dc.contributor.authorOlorunfemi, Gbenga
dc.contributor.authorVisser, Cathy
dc.contributor.authorVan Aardt, M.C. (Matthys Cornelis)
dc.contributor.authorDreyer, Greta
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-18T11:43:27Z
dc.date.available2024-09-18T11:43:27Z
dc.date.issued2023-04-13
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supporting information files.en_US
dc.descriptionSUPPORTING INFORMATION : Dataset S1.en_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE : The main objective of this study was to evaluate the Medically Necessary Time Sensitive (MeNTS) scoring system in triaging gynaecologic oncologic surgery during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIAL AND METHODS : This was a retrospective cross-sectional study including 209 patients who either had surgery (151) or surgery postponed (58) between the 26th March and 30th September 2020 in an academic hospital in South Africa. The MeNTS score was used to independently score each patient three times by two observers. RESULTS : The mean age of the participants was 46.6 ± 15 years and the cumulative mean MeNTS score was 51.0 ± 5.1. Over two-thirds of the cases had surgery. There was no significant difference between the first and second observers’ cumulative scores, 51.0 vs 51.1 (p 0.77). The cumulative score among those who had surgery was significantly lower than that for those whose surgeries were postponed, 49.8 vs 54.1 (p <0.0001). The intra-observer and inter-observer reliability were 0.78 and 0.74 respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables, those with low cumulative MeNTS scores were about 5 times more likely to have surgery than those with high scores (Adj. OR = 4.67, 95% CI: 1.92–11.4, p <0.001. Patients with malignant diagnosis were also 5 times more likely to be operated than those with benign diagnosis (Adj. OR = 5.03, 95% CI: 1.73–14.6, p <0.001. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.85 suggesting an excellent discriminatory power between those who were operated and those who were postponed. CONCLUSION : The study provided some insight into the potential usefulness of MeNTS score in prioritizing patients for surgery in gynaecologic oncologic sub-specialty. The score performed well across a range of gynaecologic conditions and procedures with good intra-observer and inter-observer consistency and reliability. This is a prioritization tool that is dynamically adaptable to accommodate changes in resources availability and operating theatre capacity.en_US
dc.description.departmentObstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.description.librarianam2024en_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingen_US
dc.description.urihttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/en_US
dc.identifier.citationSajo, A.E., Mouton, A., Olorunfemi, G., Visser, C,, V., Van Aardt, M.C. & Dreyer, G. (2023) Evaluation of the medically necessary, time sensitive triage score during and beyond the local COVID-19 pandemic in the Gynaecologic Oncology Unit of a tertiary hospital in South Africa. PLoS One 18(4): e0284177. https://DOI.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284177.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1371/journal.pone.0284177
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/98300
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2023 Sajo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.subjectPandemicen_US
dc.subjectMedically necessary time sensitive (MeNTS)en_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemicen_US
dc.subjectCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)en_US
dc.subjectSouth Africa (SA)en_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.subjectGynaecologic oncologic surgeryen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the medically necessary, time sensitive triage score during and beyond the local COVID-19 pandemic in the gynaecologic oncology unit of a tertiary hospital in South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sajo_Evaluation_2023.pdf
Size:
766.19 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sajo_EvaluationDatasetS1_2023.xls
Size:
94 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel
Description:
Dataset S1

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: