S v Williams : a springboard for further debate about corporal punishment
Loading...
Date
Authors
Skelton, Ann, 1961-
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Juta Law
Abstract
In an early judgment of the Constitutional Court, S v Williams, Justice Langa
found that judicial whippings were unconstitutional because they violated
young offenders’ rights to dignity and humane treatment. Former Chief
Justice Langa was also a member of the unanimous court that found the law
prohibiting corporal punishment in schools to be a reasonable and justifiable
infringement of their parents’ right to religious freedom. However, s 12 of the
South African Constitution guarantees everyone the right to be protected
from all forms of violence, either from public or private sources. This
contribution considers how the court might deal with a challenge to the
constitutionality of the common-law defence of reasonable chastisement,
which permits corporal punishment of children by their parents in their own
homes.
Description
Keywords
Reasonable chastisement, Corporal punishment of children, Parents, Constitutional Court
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Skelton, A 2015, 'S v Williams : a springboard for further debate about corporal punishment', Acta Juridica, pp. 336-359.