The acquisition of constructions : does modality matter?

dc.contributor.authorWright, Richenda
dc.contributor.authorGeertsema, Salome
dc.contributor.authorLe Roux, Mia
dc.contributor.authorWinckel, Elodie
dc.contributor.authorDąbrowska, Ewa
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-29T12:33:02Z
dc.date.available2025-04-29T12:33:02Z
dc.date.issued2024-06-12
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Language analytic ability is well researched in the context of foreign language acquisition but its role in the acquisition of grammar in the native language is under investigation. OBJECTIVES: Our study explored the influence of language analytic ability and print exposure on receptive grammar and reading comprehension in childhood. Additionally, we investigated whether exposure to specific constructions through the written modality held an advantage over exposure in the audio modality. METHOD: We assessed the language analytic ability, reading comprehension, reading fluency, print exposure, and receptive grammar of 12-year-olds. Subsequently, we exposed them to written or spoken target constructions, followed by an assessment of receptive grammar. Linear regression models were used to analyse the contributions of reading fluency, print exposure, and language analytic ability to reading comprehension and receptive grammar. We also examined the influence of the intervention on receptive grammar. RESULTS: Language analytic ability and print exposure significantly predicted receptive grammar. Print exposure significantly predicted reading comprehension and improvement in receptive grammar. CONCLUSION: Language analytic ability is important for grammar and reading comprehension development. Print exposure enhances reading comprehension by supporting vocabulary development and providing exposure to intricate structures. Both language analytic ability and experience are key factors in construction acquisition. CONTRIBUTION: This study adds to the growing body of evidence emphasising the role of language analytic skills in native language grammar acquisition and advocates for explicit grammar teaching. Furthermore, it underscores the importance of adequate print exposure in grammar acquisition and the development of reading comprehension skills.en_US
dc.description.departmentSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiologyen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-04:Quality Educationen_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.rw.org.zaen_US
dc.identifier.citationWright, R., Geertsema, S., Le Roux, M., et al. 2024, ‘The acquisition of constructions : does modality matter?’, Reading & Writing, vol. 15, no. 1, art. 489, doi : 10.4102/rw.v15i1.489.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2079-8245 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2308-1422 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.4102/rw.v15i1.489
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/102250
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.rights© 2024. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.subjectLiteracyen_US
dc.subjectPrint exposureen_US
dc.subjectLanguage aptitudeen_US
dc.subjectGrammaren_US
dc.subjectLanguage analytic abilityen_US
dc.subjectSDG-04: Quality educationen_US
dc.titleThe acquisition of constructions : does modality matter?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wright_Acquisition_2024.pdf
Size:
1003.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: