Economic justice in Luke 19:1-10 : a post-apartheid imperial critical reading with reference to the land question in South Africa

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Van Eck, Ernest
dc.contributor.coadvisor Streett, Alan
dc.contributor.postgraduate Motuku, Kenosi Patson
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-01T11:16:14Z
dc.date.available 2024-03-01T11:16:14Z
dc.date.created 2024-04-30
dc.date.issued 2023-11-17
dc.description Thesis (PhD (New Testament and Related Literature))--University of Pretoria, 2023. en_US
dc.description.abstract The primary thesis of this study is that Zacchaeus’ words in Luke 19:1-10 micronarrative are a radical futuristic resolve responding to Luke’s radical message of ‘good news to the poor’ and ‘wealth renunciation’. Met squarely with the Saviour, Zacchaeus repents of his economically fraudulent ways, and reconciles himself with his estranged community by performing economic restitution and wealth divestiture to the victims of his unjust economic practices. This penitential commitment by Zacchaeus is radical when analysed within the imperial values of Roman-Palestine specifically, and the Graeco-Roman world generally. In a world where the ruling elites amassed wealth through oppression, tyranny, and exploitation of the poor, Zacchaeus’ heed Luke’s radical message of ‘care and concern’ for the poor, and restores illegitimate wealth stolen from the poor. The study deduces that Luke’s economic message is radical and counter-cultural to the dominant values of the Roman-Palestinian world of the Lukan text, and the Graeco-Roman social-world of its readers. Luke’s economic message is viewed as representing God’s economy in contradistinction to the unjust Graeco-Roman economy, with Zacchaeus understood as epitomising the radical response required in heeding Luke’s radical call. Thus, Luke challenges the Palestinian-Roman native collaborators like Zacchaeus who benefits economically by colluding with Roman oppressors in extracting wealth from the poor agrarian peasants, and the Graeco-Roman elites who amasses wealth through heavy taxation, and expropriation of land through oppressive systems and institutions designed to benefit the elites. This radical economic message of Luke, and the attendant radical response by Zacchaeus, is viewed as a necessary paradigm required in bringing about justice and genuine reconciliation between Blacks and Whites in post-apartheid South Africa. The thesis argues that the CODESA negotiations, the TRC nation-building efforts, and the post-apartheid economic policy trajectory have not been effective in addressing the colonial apartheid economic and spatial injustices, which informs the poor race-relations between Blacks and Whites in South Africa today. A ‘Zacchaeus moment’ is thus proposed as a probable theological paradigm in addressing economic inequality and the land question in post-apartheid South Africa today. Thus, the prophetic role of theology is signified by this study. en_US
dc.description.availability Unrestricted en_US
dc.description.degree PhD (New Testament and Related Literature) en_US
dc.description.department New Testament Studies en_US
dc.description.faculty Faculty of Theology and Religion en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-01: No poverty en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-10: Reduces inequalities en_US
dc.description.sdg SDG-16: Peace,justice and strong institutions en_US
dc.description.sponsorship National Research Foundation University of Pretoria en_US
dc.identifier.citation In his thesis, Economic justice in Luke 19:1-10: A post-apartheid imperial critical reading with reference to the land question in South Africa, the candidate explores economic justice in Luke 19:1-10, focusing on the first-century Roman-Palestinian world, and applying it to the post-apartheid democratic South African situation. The Lukan wealth-poverty themes and the Luke 19:1-10 micro-narrative are analysed through an imperial-critical optic lens, focusing on economic and land ownership patterns. The primary finding is that Luke's message of 'good news to the poor' and 'wealth renunciation' in favour of the poor is a radical counter-narrative that goes against the elite’s economic and spatial hegemony. Zacchaeus exemplifies this message. This message challenges the outcomes of the CODESA negotiated political settlement and the TRC work on nation-building, whilst presenting a theological paradigm for genuine justice and reconciliation between blacks and whites in post-apartheid South Africa. en_US
dc.identifier.doi Disclaimer letter en_US
dc.identifier.other A2024 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/95028
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher University of Pretoria
dc.rights © 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subject UCTD en_US
dc.subject Gospel of Luke en_US
dc.subject Luke 19:1-10
dc.subject Economic Justice
dc.subject Land Question
dc.subject South African History
dc.subject Land Dispossession
dc.subject Colonialism
dc.subject Inequality
dc.subject Roman Economy
dc.title Economic justice in Luke 19:1-10 : a post-apartheid imperial critical reading with reference to the land question in South Africa en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record