A progressive reading of customary and religious norms associated with heteronormativity in South Africa

Abstract

Customs that enforce heteronormativity, generally also safeguard the interests of society’s vulnerable, for instance orphans and widows, to name two examples. The recognition that non-heterosexual people is a minority group with legitimate concerns is important, as they could contribute to family support while maintaining their identity and mental well-being. Non-heterosexual individuals’ interests are protected in the current Constitution; however, their protection must transform social support structures beyond written laws. Social structures tend to accept change at a slower pace than progressive laws. In South Africa the gender-normative and heteronormative are generally being overridden by a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ code, where sexual minorities are gradually gaining acceptance in a dominantly heteronormative society. In this article, the authors argue against the customs of spousal inheritance and ukuthwala, which, among others, are being imposed on non-heterosexual people, because they suggest a person’s sexuality belongs to a clan. These cultural practices may serve a purpose in society but could be interpreted to support constitutional values. For instance, traditional healers as custodians of culture have documented instances of being gender-fluid, when a female could be possessed by a male spirit, thus requiring a female sexual partner. Indigenous culture as it is known, has been tainted by capitalism, patriarchy, foreign religion, and the absolute opinions of a few elders. Which begs the question whether heteronormativity truly is a South African construct.